Phipps v. Sutherland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The plain language used in the 1948 amendment ... shows that it was the intention of the legislature to make the statute retrospective in its application.”
• if statute is “one not affecting vested interests”
• if statute is \one not affecting vested interests\
• discussing earlier version of current constitutional provision
• discussing earlier version of current constitutional provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).