Phipps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutes regulating the planting of oysters did not diminish public's fishing rights
• statutes regulating the planting of oysters did not diminish public’s fishing rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hess v. Muir
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1886-06-24· cited 42×
• Bostick v. Smoot Sand and Gravel Corporation
  D. Maryland· 1957-08-21· cited 9×
• State v. Hals
  Washington Supreme Court· 1916-04-05· cited 7×
• United States v. State
  W.D. Washington· 1994-12-20· cited 3×
• United States v. State of Wash.
  W.D. Washington· 1994-12-20· cited 2×
• Knight v. State
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1896-03-31