Phipps v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that state must prove that prior offenses fall within seven-year period to enhance punishment for DUI under NRS 484.3792
• observing that oral amendments to a complaint or information are permissible \where they are detailed and specific and are eventually memorialized\
• reversing and remanding to resentence for a misdemeanor offense where the State failed to comply with the statutory requirements for enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parsons v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-10-23· cited 20×
• Ronning v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-01-26· cited 6×
• State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety v. Paul
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24