Skip to main content
· 1/8/1999

Phimister v. Windermere Realty, Inc.

Citations

  • 93 Wash. App. 1048
  • 1999 Wash. App. LEXIS 3196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether Noerr-Pennington immunity barred suit for tortious interference, but deciding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for tortious interference
  • “There exists, however, an exception to the Noeyr[~]Pennington doctrine for ‘sham’ litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.