Skip to main content
· 6/8/1990

Philpott v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Citations

  • 739 F. Supp. 380
  • 1990 WL 89453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no jurisdiction to remove a case from state court when the defendant’s notice of removal was filed subsequent to the judgment and to the defendant’s postjudgment motion
  • holding 7 No. 1-12-0597 that there was no jurisdiction to remove a case from state court when the defendant's notice of removal was filed subsequent to the judgment and to the defendant's postjudgment motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.