Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. v. Calvin Clothing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding nonuse based on testimony that trademark owner “did not make any sales of men’s clothing” under the trademark for a 10-year period
• admitting Eveready survey where Calvin Klein and junior mark were sold in same store
• \[T]he average clothing customer is not particularly sophisticated.\
• “[T]he average clothing customer is not particularly sophisticated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).