Phillips v. Trent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no individual liability under the earlier version of CFEPA’s anti-discrimination provisions, § 46a- 60(a)(1)
• holding that WCA did not bar common law tort claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress
• holding that an employer “may not be found liable for negligent infliction of emotional distress arising out of conduct occurring within a continuing employment context, as distinguished from conduct occurring in the termination of employment.”
• noting that Perodeau’s concern about employee expectations applies to workplace-based claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress
• balancing social costs against social benefits in considering whether to recognize tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress in ongoing employment context
• balancing social costs against social benefits in considering whether to recognize tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress in ongoing employment context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).