Phillips v. Tiona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a private health provider that contracted with a state prison was not a “public entity” under the ADA
• concluding that a private health provider that contracted with a state prison was not a “public entity” under the ADA
• concluding that a private health provider that contracted with a state prison was not a “public entity” under the ADA
• holding that “Title II of the ADA does not apply to federal prisoners in federal prisons”
• holding that the ADA does not apply to private prisons
• assuming private prison employees housing state prisoners act under color of state law, citing other cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).