Phillips v. State ex rel. Dorner
Citations
- 75 Fla. 93
- 77 So. 665
Syllabus
<p>1. The established principle is that a court created within and for a particular territory is bound in the exercise of its powers by the limits of such territory, and that no judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful- authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of.the court or judge by whom it is issued.</p> <p>2. There is no statutory authority in this State for the service of a writ of summons issued from a County Judge’s Court in a civil case upon a sole defendant outside- of the limits of the territorial jurisdiction of the court issuing it, and therefore the service of such process beyond the territorial jurisdiction of such court gives to the court no jurisdiction over such defendant.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ableman v. BoothSupreme Court· 1859-03-18· cited 272×
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court· 1893-05-01· cited 130×
- Turrill v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court· 1856-01-15· cited 16×
- Molyneux v. Seymour, Fanning & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 1860-01-15· cited 14×
- Sanchez v. HaynesSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 9×
- Isett v. StuartIllinois Supreme Court· 1875-09-15· cited 3×
- C. E. Ingalls & Brother v. Merchants Broom Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 1914-11-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.