Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 11/4/1992
Phillips v. State
Citations
- 40 Ark. App. 19
- 840 S.W.2d 808
- 1992 Ark. App. LEXIS 705
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Phillips could not demonstrate prejudice when the petition alleged a charge of delivery of a controlled substance instead of delivery of a counterfeit substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cooper, Mayfield, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cheshire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2003-01-22· cited 12×
- Tallant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1993-06-16· cited 11×
- Scott Dewayne Brookshire v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-09-01· cited 4×
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-02-24· cited 3×
- Turman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2015-06-17· cited 2×
- Garret E. Nichols v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-09-29· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Snell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-12-15· cited 68×
- Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-02-09· cited 23×
- Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-02-14· cited 14×
- Fitzpatrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-03-09· cited 14×
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-07-08· cited 10×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1985-02-20· cited 9×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-07-06· cited 6×
- Bonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-05-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.