Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/17/2008

Phillips v. Selig

Citations

959 A.2d 420
2008 Pa. Super. 244
2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that evidence of parties' twenty-year business relationship was insufficient as a matter of law to show a reasonable likelihood of a future contractual relationship
holding that evidence of exclusive ten-year relationship between parties did not support inference that contracts would have been renewed, because \a mere historical relationship between parties is not sufficient to show a prospective contractual relationship\
stating that, under Pennsylvania law, “[t]he essential elements of a claim for civil conspiracy are as follows: (1
stating that the second element requires proof that the defendant acted for the specific purpose of causing harm to the plaintiff
refusing to find a prospective contractual relation based upon evidence of an existing contractual relationship
stating that the first element of a tortious interference claim is the existence of a contractual relationship or prospective contractual relationship between the plaintiff and another party, and that a prospective relationship must be “something more than a mere hope”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donohue, Gantman, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Phillips v. Selig

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.