Skip to main content
· 6/2/1992

Phillips v. Riverside, Inc.

Citations

  • 796 F. Supp. 403
  • 15 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1851
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8826
  • 1992 WL 134711

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no presumption of receipt where, although a witness testified that she remembered mailing a letter, she “did not indicate whether she or someone else actually placed it in the mailbox or delivered it to the post office,” nor was there testimony that proper postage was affixed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Susan Webber Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.