District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/29/1977
Phillips v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Citations
- 347 So. 2d 465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court has the inherent jurisdiction and right to protect minors and their property and to determine whether a contract by which the attorney was employed was fair and reasonable at the time it was entered into
- holding that a court has the inherent jurisdiction and right to protect minors and their property and to determine whether a contract by which the attorney was employed was fair and reasonable at the time it was entered into
- “The next friend of a minor has power to act on that minor’s behalf.”
- circuit court has inherent jurisdiction and right to protect minors and their property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Yurgel v. YurgelSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 65×
- Leonard C. Arnold, Ltd. v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-02-20· cited 31×
- STATE, DEPT. OF HLTH. & REHAB. SERVICES v. HollisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-13· cited 17×
- Nixon v. BrysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-06· cited 12×
- Buncayo v. DribinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-22· cited 11×
- Vollmar Ex Rel. Vollmar v. RuprightIndiana Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 11×
- Padgett v. PettisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-09· cited 10×
- Auerbach v. McKinneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-20· cited 7×
- Burden v. DickmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-06· cited 6×
- Matthew Garcia v. Cynthia GuilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-05· cited 4×
- Wilson v. GriffithsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-15· cited 3×
- Gamble v. WellsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-20· cited 2×
- Crouch v. RihaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-14· cited 2×
- Stinson ex rel. Deily v. GEICO Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-15· cited 1×
- In re Amendment to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar-Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(b) of the Rules of Professional ConductSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28· cited 1×
- Amend. to Regulating Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.5Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28
- In Re Guardianship of DeilyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-15
- Loper v. ApfelbeckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-27
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.