Phillips v. Matson Nav. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court may take judicial notice of a publicly recorded deed
• taking judicial notice of a recorded deed, a copy of which was attached as an exhibit to the appellant’s brief
• taking judicial notice of a recorded deed, a copy of which was attached as an exhibit to the appellant’s brief
• taking judicial notice of a recorded deed because it was “capable of accurate and ready determination[,]” but holding we could not take judicial notice of “emails, letters, and affidavits” because the accuracy of the documents were “subject to question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).