Phillips v. Grayson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that special master improperly elevated burden of proving causation and remanding to special master for application of appropriate burden
• finding that special master improperly elevated burden of proving causation and remanding to special master for application of appropriate burden
• subjecting a medical theory that the vaccine can cause the injury complained to a preponderant evidence review, improperly elevated petitioner’s burden, citing Andreu, Walther, and Pafford
• “[T]he [sjpecial [mjaster impermissibly elevated the burden of proof on the requirement that [petitioner provide a medical theory causally linking the flu vaccine to [the injury].”
• 60 days is “reasonable and appropriate” in a flu/GBS case
• 60 days is “reasonable and appropriate” in a flu/GBS case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).