Phillips v. Edward J. Healy Rehabilitation Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to “ ‘conclusive preclusion of defense’ provision of [§ 31-297 (b)]”
• “[i]t is the power and the duty of the commissioner ... to determine the facts”
• ‘‘[j]urisdiction of the subject-matter is the power [of a tribunal] to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• ‘‘[I]t is up to the legislatures, not courts, to decide on the wisdom and utility of legislation. . . . [C]ourts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.’’ (Inter- nal quotation marks omitted.)
• ‘‘[I]t is up to the legislatures, not courts, to decide on the wisdom and utility of legislation. . . . [C]ourts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• ‘‘[I]t is up to the legislatures, not courts, to decide on the wisdom and utility of legislation. . . . [C]ourts do not substitute their social and economic beliefs for the judgment of legislative bodies, who are elected to pass laws.’’ (Inter- nal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).