Phillips v. Cooper
Citations
- 50 Miss. 722
Syllabus
<p>1. Pleadings — Defects Therein — Waiver Thereof. — A party going to trial without objecting to a defect in the pleadings cannot be heard to complain for the first time in the appellate court. Ample power is given by the statute to amend or correct any defect in the pleadings.</p> <p>2. Evidence — Record — General Rule. — The general rule is, that a record must be established by the highest attainable evidence. This rule is relaxed in most cases, so that proof may be made by copy. Records are allowed to be shown by the admissions of parties under certain circumstances, but with hesitation and caution.</p> <p>3. Same — Same — Admissions. — Admissions of parties are admissible where there is not, in the judgment of the law, higher and better evidence in existence to be produced. A record cannot be proven by secondary or parol evidence, unless its loss or destruction be shown.</p> <p>4. Same — Affidavit and Bond. —The recitals of an affidavit and bond do not assert the existence of valid judgments. They merely assert that the executions on their face purport to be issued on certain judgments. These recitals are not admissions made in open court, nor are they solemn admissions made in the course of judicial proceedings, and hence are not admissible to prove a record.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that generally, in case of a lost or destroyed record, parol evidence is admissible of its contents, especially when no higher evidence is shown to exist
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tarbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tittle v. BonnerMississippi Supreme Court· 1876-10-15· cited 12×
- Peake v. CameronSupreme Court of Missouri· 1890-10-15· cited 12×
- Grubbs v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court· 1877-04-15· cited 2×
- Miller v. Tennant-Stribling Shoe Co.Fifth Circuit· 1903-01-13· cited 1×
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2002-04-30
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court· 1832-01-15· cited 175×
- McKnight v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1843-02-28· cited 94×
- Spencer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1828-02-15· cited 21×
- Jenner v. JoliffeNew York Supreme Court· 1810-05-15· cited 20×
- Lyman v. LymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1814-09-15· cited 20×
- Walden v. DavisonNew York Supreme Court· 1836-10-15· cited 19×
- Nixon v. PorterMississippi Supreme Court· 1858-04-15· cited 10×
- M'Ewin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1872-07-01· cited 9×
- Foster v. TrullNew York Supreme Court· 1815-10-15· cited 5×
- Page & Bacon v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1851-10-15· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.