Phillips v. Beaber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that statutory interpretation should not be mechanistic and should not elevate form over substance
• stating that statutory interpretation should not be mechanistic and should not elevate form over substance
• noting that “we presume that the Legislature acted with knowledge of the common law”
• equating the right of primary possession with \custody\ and adding that primary possession and establishing a child's residence are \core rights of managing conservatorship\
• equating the right of primary possession with “custody” and adding that primary possession and establishing a child’s residence are “core rights of managing conservatorship”
• equating the right of primary possession with “custody” and adding that primary possession and establishing a child’s residence are “core rights of managing conservatorship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).