Phillips' Estate
Citations
- 238 Pa. 423
- 86 A. 289
- 1913 Pa. LEXIS 987
Syllabus
<p>Insurance — Life insurance — Assignment of policy — Insurable interest — Brother and sister — Decedent’s estate.</p> <p>1. Brothers and sisters have an insurable interest in each other’s lives.</p> <p>2. If an insurance policy is valid at the time when it is made, it does not become invalid thereafter because it is assigned to one who may not have an insurable interest, provided it was taken out in good faith.</p> <p>3. Upon the audit of the account of an executor it appeared that the accountant held a sum of money which had been paid to the estate upon a policy of insurance upon the life of the decedent’s brother, which policy had been taken out by the brother, who was unmarried and without children, payable to the decedent. It further appeared that about a year later the brother stated to the agent of the company that he was unable to pay the premiums; that he wanted his sister to get the money from the policy, and that she was willing to pay all future premiums; and thereupon he executed an absolute assignment of all his right, title and interest in the policy to the decedent, who subsequently paid all premiums. The decedent predeceased her brother, leaving a will disposing of her estate. Her brother subsequently died and the amount of the policy was paid by the company to the executor of the sister. The fund was thereupon claimed by the administrator of the deceased brother, upon the contention that the assignment was in reality intended only as collateral security for money advanced in payment of premiums. Held, there was nothing in the evidence to indicate that the assignment was merely as collateral security; that the transaction was in good faith; and that the fund was properly held as part of the sister’s estate.</p>
Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Potter, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Young v. HippleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-04-10· cited 54×
- United Security Life Insurance v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-04-18· cited 14×
- Lawler v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1915-04-19· cited 10×
- Mutual Savings Life Insurance Company v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama· 1973-06-07· cited 8×
- Bonistalli v. BonistalliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-12-31· cited 8×
- Equitable Life Insurance v. CummingsThird Circuit· 1925-03-16· cited 4×
- Pratt v. MageeFayette County Court· 1921-11-22
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court· 1877-04-30· cited 216×
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court· 1877-05-18· cited 57×
- Lord v. DallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1815-03-15· cited 50×
- Lewis v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1872-02-15· cited 41×
- Appeal of CorsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1886-10-04· cited 24×
- Hosmer v. WelchMichigan Supreme Court· 1895-12-17· cited 21×
- Mullen v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-07-15· cited 15×
- Lane v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court· 1897-10-30· cited 13×
- Lenig v. EisenhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-05-27· cited 11×
- Vanormer v. HornbergerSynder County Court of Common Pleas· 1891-05-25· cited 7×
- Loomis v. Eagle Life & Health InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1856-09-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.