Skip to main content
· 11/1/2023

PHILLIPS, ANDRE TREMOND v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the cumulative impact of prejudice “assuming that [petitioner’s] attorney was deficient” in two respects
  • “The general instruction given at the end of the trial charging the jury to give separate consideration to each defendant was insufficient to satisfy Richardson.”
  • statement that “justice cries out for [conviction]” did not render trial fundamentally unfair

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.