Skip to main content
· 4/11/1995

Phillip W. Stanfield v. Osborne Industries, Inc., Stanley M. Thibault, Ronald Thibault

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 867
  • 34 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1456
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 7988
  • 1995 WL 215277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding summary judgment for the licensee appropriate where no special relationship between the parties existed and no evidence of actual control over the licensee existed
  • “[Lanham Act] plaintiff must be a competitor of the defendant and allege a competitive injury”
  • same but as applied to false association

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Tacha, Campos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.