Skip to main content
· 12/27/1979

Phillip KEMP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIRMINGHAM NEWS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 608 F.2d 1049
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9354
  • 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,537
  • 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Gonzales because the absent class member in Kemp “received the same relief as all other members of the class”
  • distinguishing Gonzales because the absent class member in Kemp “received the same relief as all other members of the class”
  • Title VII claim of race discrimination in employment practices dismissed on grounds of res judicata
  • “Because Kemp received the same relief as all other members of the class, Gonzales is inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Godbold, Roney, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.