Skip to main content
· 10/19/1994

Phillip Harvey v. Richard Gramley and Roland W. Burris

Citations

  • 37 F.3d 1501
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34974
  • 1994 WL 574101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “If the motion [for extension of time to appeal] is not timely made, the district court is not authorized to grant an extension of the appeal period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.