Phillip Fantone v. Fred Latini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a pro se complaint must still meet Iqbal’s plausibility standard
• holding that a pro se complaint must still meet Iqbal’s plausibility standard
• holding that a pro se complaint must still meet Twombly and Iqbal's plausibility standard
• holding that a pro se complaint must still meet Iqbal’s plausibility standard
• recognizing that pro se claimants must satisfy Twombly and Iqbal’s pleading standards
• holding that inmate’s placement in the RHU and loss of parole did not infringe his liberty interests, even though his misconduct charges -- of which he was ultimately cleared -- “probably caused the Parole Board to rescind his parole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).