Phillip E. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Defendant v. C & S Adjusters, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Claimant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that venue in an action under FDCPA was proper where consumer resided and where debt collection letter had been sent
• holding that venue in an action under FDCPA was proper where consumer resided and where debt collection letter had been sent
• concluding that single collection notice forwarded into presiding district was sufficient to make venue proper
• holding that “receipt of a collection notice is a substantial part of the events giving rise to a claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act”
• concluding that receipt of a collection notice is a substantial part of the events giving rise to an FDCPA claim for purposes of the general venue statute
• holding that a proper venue for a plaintiff’s claims under the FDCPA, under Section 1391(b)(2), was the “district in which the debtor resides and to which a bill collector’s demand for payment was forwarded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).