Phillip Burgess v. State of Tennessee

Syllabus

The Petitioner, Phillip Matthew Burgess, appeals as of right from the Marshall County Circuit Court's denial of his petition forpost-conviction relief, wherein he challenged his convictions for premeditated first degree murder, attempted first degree murder, and aggravated assault. On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that he received the ineffective assistance of trial counsel3 because counsel (1) failed to file a motion or object at trial to the destruction of exculpatory evidence (2) \coerced\ the Petitioner into choosing not to testify (3) failed to pursue a defense theory of diminished capacity (4) failed to interview or call several witnesses and subpoena the Petitioner's telephone records and (5) failed to promptly file a motion to withdraw after a conflict of interest arose. The Petitioner also contends that he received the ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to call a witness at the sentencing hearing and failed to timely file an application for permission to appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court after this court filed its opinion in the direct appeal. Following our review, we affirm.