Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was likely to succeed on its takings claim because a state statute mandating disclosure of products' ingredients list (a valuable trade secret
• recognizing the “reality that a governmental entity which creates a market’s supply or sets its prices may be expected to alter property rights in the course of modifying its regulations”
• affirming a preliminary injunction that was based on a facial takings claim
• “[Permission to continue operating a lawful business is not the type of government benefit on which a Monsanto-type exchange validly may be predicated.”
• “[T]he mere granting of permission to engage in routine activities, incident to existing property rights, does not afford compensation sufficient to support a Monsanto-like exchange.”
• “Likelihood of success is the touchstone of the preliminary injunction inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).