Skip to main content
· 4/26/1995

Philip Friedman, Anna Friedman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 53 F.3d 523
  • 154 A.L.R. Fed. 679
  • 75 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1974
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that because the innocent spouse rule is remedial in nature, “it is construed and applied liberally in favor of the person claiming its benefits”
  • \Extravagant tax savings may alert even a financially unsophisticated spouse to the possible improprieties of a tax scheme.\
  • husband concealed enormous financial losses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Cardamone, Winter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.