Philip A. Syverson v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where railroad employee was attacked near an area that had been “a magnet for vagrants,” Defendant’s argument that the trespasser did not come from that area was unavailing.
• “Reasonable care is determined in light of whether or not a particular danger was foreseeable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).