Phile v. Corson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Mere ‘commonality in subject matter’ does not render actions parallel.” (quoting Dittmer, 146 F.3d at 118)
• “[a]s the district court correctly concluded, because this case does not involve issuing or modifying [a matrimonial] decree, and is brought by a third-party plaintiff, the domestic relations exception does not apply.”
• “[E]ven if subject matter jurisdiction lies over a particular matrimonial action, federal courts may properly abstain from adjudicating such actions in view of the greater interest and expertise of state courts in this field.”
• “Mere commonality in subject matter does not render actions parallel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).