Skip to main content
· 2/20/1914

Philadelphia v. Hays

Citations

  • 56 Pa. Super. 352
  • 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 91

Syllabus

<p>Poor law — Order for support — Act of June IS, 18S6, P. L. 589 — Appeal — Record—Evidence.</p> <p>1. An appeal from an order of the quarter sessions in proceedings under the Act of June 13, 1836, P. L. 539, directing a grandfather to pay a weekly sum for the support of his grandchild, acts as a certiorari only, and does not carry up the evidence.</p> <p>2. In such a case the order will be sustained if the affidavit on which the proceeding is based shows that the respondent was the grandfather of the child, that he resided within the jurisdiction of the court, and that he was of financial ability to maintain or aid in maintaining the child. It is not necessary that the record should show that the child had been legally found to be a pauper.</p> <p>3. If such an order, however, after directing the payment of the weekly sum, goes further and directs the respondent to pay the costs, to give security for future weekly payments and to stand committed until the order is complied with, the portions of the order relating to the payment of costs and the giving of a bond, will be stricken off by the appellate court as unwarranted by law.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the salvor “is, to all intents and purposes, a joint owner” of the property along with the original owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Head, Henderson, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.