Skip to main content
· 1/14/2005

Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Federal Insurance

Citations

  • 385 F. Supp. 2d 280
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 460
  • 2005 WL 78783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no coverage for airport parking lot closure when government grounded planes temporarily following September 11, 2001
  • “‘Rebuild,’ ‘repair’ and ‘replace’ all strongly suggest that the damage contemplated by the Policy is physical in nature.”
  • “‘Rebuild,’ ‘repair’ and ‘replace’ all strongly suggest that the damage contemplated by the Policy is physical in nature.”
  • “‘Rebuild,’ ‘repair’ and ‘replace’ all strongly suggest that the damage contemplated by the Policy is physical in nature.”
  • “While this unprecedented order may have temporarily obviated the need for Plaintiff’s parking services, it did not prohibit access to Plaintiff’s garages and therefore cannot be used to invoke coverage under Plaintiff’s policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.