Skip to main content
· 3/11/1927

Philadelphia Life Ins. Co. v. Burgess

Citations

  • 18 F.2d 599
  • 1927 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing diligence requirement in seeking discovery to modify 19 a case schedule
  • an ALJ’s rejection of a physician’s opinion on the ground that it 19 was contrary to clinical findings in the record was “broad and vague, failing to specify why the 20 ALJ felt the treating physician’s opinion was flawed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ernest F. Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.