· 12/28/1951
Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc. v. Kerotest Mfg. Co.
Citations
- 101 F. Supp. 820
- 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that trial would have to be adjourned because third-party defendant could “make a motion directed to the pleadings and the parties could make further dispositive motions once all discovery was finally completed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.