Philadelphia, Baltimore & Wilmington R. R. v. Layer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employer need not have a policy prohibiting the use of company property for personal use because no such policy is necessary for an employee to understand the wrongfulness of that conduct
• employer need not have a policy prohibiting the use of company property for personal use because no such policy is necessary for an employee to understand the wrongfulness of that conduct
• claimant did not meet his burden of proving that his unauthorized personal use of employer’s vehicle was not contrary to a reasonable standard of behavior expected of an employee
• claimant did not meet his burden of proving that his unauthorized personal use of employer's vehicle was not contrary to a reasonable standard of behavior expected of an employee
• employer need not have a policy prohibiting the use of company property for personal use because no such policy is necessary for an employee to understand the wrongfulness of that conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).