Skip to main content
· 2/25/1889

Philad., W. & B. R. v. McCormick

Citations

  • 124 Pa. 427
  • 23 W.N.C. 344
  • 16 A. 848
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1047

Syllabus

<p>(a) There was evidence that the conductor of a passenger train, on a dark night, announced the approach of a station where passengers were to change cars and afterward stopped the train upon a bridge, without giving notice that the station was not reached; that a passenger then arose from his seat in a crowded and unlighted ear, descended from the steps, fell over the bridge and was drowned.</p> <p>1. Under such circumstances, the passenger had the right to suppose that the train had reached the station; proper attention to the safety of the passengers would have required some notice or warning to them to retain their seats ; and it was not error to submit the question of the negligence of the defendant company to the jury.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how prisoners who have reached the status of “parolee” are entitled to certain procedural due process rights before their parole may be revoked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterbett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.