· 4/15/1889
Philad. & R. R. v. Love
Citations
- 125 Pa. 488
- 17 A. 455
- 1889 Pa. LEXIS 739
Syllabus
<p>A director of a corporation who voted against a reconstruction plan to reduce the value of the corporate securities, recommended by the board to the holders for their adoption, is not estopped as an individual by the action of the board, although his opposition to its action was not made known to the public.</p>
Judges: Clark, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.