Phil Crowley Steel Corporation, a Corporation v. MacOmber Incorporated, an Ohio Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting trial judge has wide discretion to allow expert testimony even though it was revised shortly before trial
• determining whether a party has duty to supplement under Rule 26(e) is “committed to the sound discretion” of the court
• affirming district court’s decision to allow corrected damages four days before trial because documents upon which damages were calculated were available to defendant before trial
• in which the court ruled that undisclosed expert testimony correctly stating plaintiff’s damages should not be struck merely because the other party was prepared at trial only to rebut the previously disclosed incorrect testimony
• “Even if we are incorrect in finding constructive compliance with 26(e)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).