Skip to main content
· 1/8/2018

PHH Mortg. Corp. v. Stock

Citations

  • 176 A.3d 1260
  • 179 Conn. App. 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where relief sought could have been provided under KJRA, injunction relief is not proper
  • noting that parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, e.g., or waiver
  • stating the general rule that administrative remedies must be exhausted before judicial review is permissible
  • explaining an appellate court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a ruling the district court lacked jurisdiction to make in the first place
  • if district court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction over subject matter on appeal
  • “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, waiver, or estoppel; a failure to object to the court’s jurisdiction does not invest the court with the requisite subject matter jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.