· 1/8/2018
PHH Mortg. Corp. v. Stock
Citations
- 176 A.3d 1260
- 179 Conn. App. 905
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where relief sought could have been provided under KJRA, injunction relief is not proper
- noting that parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, e.g., or waiver
- stating the general rule that administrative remedies must be exhausted before judicial review is permissible
- explaining an appellate court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over a ruling the district court lacked jurisdiction to make in the first place
- if district court lacks jurisdiction, appellate court does not acquire jurisdiction over subject matter on appeal
- “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction by consent, waiver, or estoppel; a failure to object to the court’s jurisdiction does not invest the court with the requisite subject matter jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.