Phenix-Georgetown, Inc. v. Chas. H. Tompkins Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reading contract as a whole in determining that indemnity provision was not exclusive remedy
• “[T]he general rule is that contracts will be read as a whole, and every part will be interpreted with reference to the whole.”
• “The party opposing the motion [for summary judgment] need only show that there is sufficient evidence supporting the claimed factual issue to require a jury to resolve the parties’ differing versions of the truth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).