· 8/31/2016
Pheasant Hills Eldridge Condominium Owners and Facilities Association v. Charles W. Ray
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Octane Fitness applied a preponderance of the evidence standard to Patent Act cases
- finding that a case is not exceptional “merely because one side has zealously pursued or defended its claim.”
- applying the Octane Fitness standard to the “exceptional case” analysis under the Lanham Act
- “[T]o be an ‘exceptional case’ under the Lanham Act requires only that a case ‘stands out from others,’ either based on the strength of the litigating positions or the manner in which the case was litigated.” (citation omitted)
- extending the Octane framework to Lanham Act cases
- extending exceptional case standard to trademark infringement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.