Skip to main content
· 8/17/2005

PHC-Minden, L.P. D/B/A Minden Medical Center v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 193
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6569
  • 2005 WL 1979102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A relevant continuous contact in this analysis includes those contacts over a period up to the date of injury ... or up to and including the date suit commenced.... ”
  • \A relevant continuous contact inthis analysis includes those contacts overa period up to the date of injury ... or upto and including the date suit commenced ... .\
  • “A relevant continuous contact in this analysis includes those contacts over a period up to the date of injury ... or up to and including the date suit commenced....”
  • implicitly reaching a similar conclusion
  • implicitly reaching a similar conclusion
  • implicitly reaching a similar conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worthen, Griffith, Devasto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.