Pharr v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where the suspect “specifically consented to having his DNA taken, tested, and identified for purposes of criminal investigation, ... the principles enunciated in Ferguson are inapposite”
• concluding that where the suspect “specifically consented to having his DNA taken, tested, and identified for purposes of criminal investigation, . . . the principles enunciated in Ferguson are inapposite”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).