Pharr v. Broussard
Citations
- 106 La. 59
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>t. Where three persons are operating under a contract whereby one of them furnishes trees,' upon land believed to be owned by him, another furnishes money, and the third, labor, whereby said trees are to be placed on the market, as timber, and the profits are to be divided ; and the two parties last mentioned take advantage of what is apparently a technical defect in the title of the other, to enter his land for themselves, taking patents therefor, but are subsequently cast in a litigation upon the subject of the title, they do not occupy a particularly strong position from which to appeal for equitable consideration.</p> <p>%. Upon the facts, as presented in this case, the plaintiffs are held not entitled to recover money expended by them in deadening, topping and trailing trees, upon land owned by the defendants.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the CCPA’s garnishment cap did not apply to a defendant’s membership interest in a limited liability company
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.