Pharmacia Corp. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that delay in seeking preliminary injunction “knocks the bottom out of any claim of immediate and irreparable harm”
• finding no irreparable harm after a yearlong delay and collecting cases where between two- and ten-month delays precluded preliminary injunction
• “Such a delay—one full year—knocks the bottom out of any claim of immediate and irreparable harm”
• “Dilution does not implicate any public interest against consumer deception because, by definition, it protects only a trademark owner’s private interest.”
• “Dilution does not implicate any public interest against consumer deception because, by definition, it protects only a trademark owner’s private interest.”
• “Dilution does not implicate any public interest against consumer deception because, by definition, it protects only a trademark owner’s private interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).