Skip to main content
· 1/23/1991

Pharmaceia Eni Diagnostics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Citations

  • 584 A.2d 714
  • 85 Md. App. 555
  • 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that allowing the filing of an amended complaint to resurrect certain rights which were already lost would defeat the purpose of the limitations established in the rules
  • explaining that allowing the filing of an amended complaint to resurrect certain rights which were already lost would defeat the purpose of the limitations established in the rules
  • “Considering the merits of the motion to intervene, as if it had been timely filed, we would find no abuse of discretion in denying it.”
  • “once an amended complaint is accepted by the trial court it supersedes the original complaint and becomes the operative pleading in the case”
  • “once an amended complaint is accepted by the trial court it supersedes the original complaint and becomes the operative pleading in the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.