· 1/23/1991
Pharmaceia Eni Diagnostics, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
Citations
- 584 A.2d 714
- 85 Md. App. 555
- 1991 Md. App. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that allowing the filing of an amended complaint to resurrect certain rights which were already lost would defeat the purpose of the limitations established in the rules
- explaining that allowing the filing of an amended complaint to resurrect certain rights which were already lost would defeat the purpose of the limitations established in the rules
- “Considering the merits of the motion to intervene, as if it had been timely filed, we would find no abuse of discretion in denying it.”
- “once an amended complaint is accepted by the trial court it supersedes the original complaint and becomes the operative pleading in the case”
- “once an amended complaint is accepted by the trial court it supersedes the original complaint and becomes the operative pleading in the case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.