Phalanx Corp. v. Philite Radiant, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insertion of date subsequent to execution was an immaterial alteration because it did not increase the liability of the defendant
• insertion of date subsequent to execution was an immaterial alteration because it did not increase the liability of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Choi v. Korea First Bank
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-11-20· cited 2×
• Swiss Air Transport Co. v. Benn
  Civil Court of the City of New York· 1983-10-03· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Gleason v. . Hamilton
  New York Court of Appeals· 1893-06-06· cited 11×