Skip to main content
· 9/29/1995

Pha v. Chater

Citations

  • 909 F. Supp. 508
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20381
  • 1995 WL 702176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when considering the good-cause standard for expedited discovery, “the court should consider the scope of the requested discovery”
  • The “party seeking expedited discovery in advance of [the] Rule 26(f) conference has the burden of showing good cause for the requested departure from usual discovery procedures.”
  • “The good cause standard may be satisfied 9 . . . where the moving party has asserted claims of infringement and unfair competition.”
  • “[I]n every case, the court has the discretion, in the interests of justice, to prevent excessive or burdensome discovery.”
  • The “party seeking expedited discovery in advance of [the] Rule 26(f) 3 conference has the burden of showing good cause for the requested departure from usual 4 discovery procedures.”
  • denying expedited discovery request as overly broad

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.