PH v. People in Interest of SH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, under C.A.R. 4(a), a trial court is without authority to grant an extension of time to file the notice of appeal; unlike the former version of C.A.R. 4(a), such power is now vested in the appellate court
• noting, in a case applying the unique circumstances doctrine, that although the court of appeals may, in appropriate circumstances, grant a thirty-day extension for filing a notice of appeal under C.A.R. 4(a), \[t]his thirty day extension may not be enlarged\
• noting, in a case applying the unique cireumstances doe-trine, that although the court of appeals may, in appropriate cireumstances, grant a thirty-day extension for filing a notice of appeal under C.A.R. 4(a), \[this thirty day extension may not be enlarged\
• a parent's fundamental liberty interests are implicated in the determination of whether to allow an appeal to go forward in a dependency and neglect case
• a parent's fundamental liberty interests are implicated in the determination of whether to allow an appeal to go forward in a dependency and neglect case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).