Skip to main content
· 11/13/1995

Pfundstein v. Omnicom Group Inc.

Citations

  • 666 A.2d 1013
  • 285 N.J. Super. 245
  • 1995 N.J. Super. LEXIS 533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no specific personal jurisdiction over a New York corporation in severance agreement dispute with plaintiff, a New Jersey resident, where the corporation's only contacts with New Jersey were its telephone and mail communications with plaintiff
  • applying general jurisdiction analysis and declining to impute actions of subsidiary to corporate parent
  • \It is well-established that the forum contacts of a subsidiary corporation will not be imputed to a parent corporation for jurisdictional purposes without a showing of something more than mere ownership.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Long, Muir, Jr.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.